Click on a link below to download a quicktime demonstration movie (Requires Apple QuickTime 7).
Piko demonstration movie high resolution (15.2 MB)
Piko demonstration movie medium resolution (5.7 MB)
Piko demonstration movie low resolution (2 MB)
This side-by-side comparison clearly demonstrates better yields and more consistent results when using UTW tubes. An identical 2-step ultra-fast PCR was performed on a Piko 24-well cycler using either UTW tubes or a competitor’s fast tubes. PCR samples derived from each of the 24-wells were run on an agarose gel indicating the 400 bp product was specifically amplified, albeit at variable and lower efficiencies for the “competitor fast tube” samples (see lanes 3 – 6, 12 – 14, and 19 – 22).

Ultra-thin walls provide speedier thermal responses of PCR samples. A 30 ul sample in either a 0.2 ml conventional thin-walled tube (red) or a UTW tube (blue) was quickly cycled and the thermal profiles of the samples were measured using a tiny, calibrated thermistor. The conventional tubes cause the sample to lag by more than 5 °C and 10 s (never achieving programmed temperature even after 15 s).
Shown is cross section of the ultra-thin wall of a UTW 96-well tube as compared with the three competitors. The UTW vessel wall is roughly half the thickness of the competitors resulting in optimal thermal transfer to the sample.
Avg (uM) |
Std. Dev. |
%
| |
| UTW® vessels | 150 |
0.000185 |
1 |
| competitor 1 | 353 |
0.002825 |
15 |
| competitor 2 | 243 |
0.000539 |
3 |
| competitor 3 | 302 |
0.003583 |
19 |
| competitor 4 | 284 |
0.002107 |
11 |

UTW well walls are much thinner and remarkably concentric. Two wells from various 96-well microplates were cut to reveal a cross-sectional view of the walls. Note the non-uniform (as indicated by arrows) and thick walls of the competitor “thin-walled” plates.
Max (uM) |
Min (uM) |
Max Difference (uM) |
|
| UTW® vessels | 150 |
137.5 |
12.5 |
| competitor 1 | 263.0 |
225.0 |
38.0 |
| competitor 2 | 425.0 |
175.0 |
250.0 |
| competitor 3 | 350.0 |
250.0 |
150.0 |
| competitor 4 | 437.5 |
250 |
187.5 |